The identity of Jane Doe, who accused Diddy and two other men of gang rape, may finally be revealed.
According to reports, the woman can no longer be a mystery in the assault proceedings as ordered by the judge. However, he will only be named if the embattled Hip-hop icon fails to have the lawsuit dismissed.
Diddy’s Fifth Sexual Assault Accuser Almost Revealed
News of Jane Doe’s identity issue recently surfaced after a legal arbitrator ruled that she could not proceed with the assault case as an anonymous party.
MEGA
Gang-rapists argue that it is unfair for their accusers to remain anonymous while they will suffer prejudice with their identities widely reported. It seems they convinced the judge with their appeal, and now, the public may know the woman behind Jane Doe.
According to court documents, the identity of the accuser will only be revealed if the sexual assault suit proceeds. Diddy and his legal team are actively trying to get the case out of court, but it remains unclear whether their efforts will be successful.
Jane Doe filed a sexual assault lawsuit against the record producer last December, alleging that he and two co-conspirators raped her when she was just 17 years old. She is the fifth woman to accuse Diddy of intimidating behavior; however, he vehemently denied the allegations.
Diddy Breaks Silence On Gang Rape Allegations In Hot Reaction
The judge’s order to reveal Jane Doe’s identity comes after Diddy’s response to her alleged assault. He broke his silence about the case in legal documents, denying any part in the gang-rape narrative.
Through his lawyer, the “Coming Home” rapper insisted that he “never participated in, witnessed, or was or was aware of any misconduct, sexual or otherwise, involving the Plaintiff under any circumstances whatsoever.”
MEGA
Due to his innocent stance, Diddy refused to comply with Jane Doe’s request for help regarding the alleged incident. He lost ten points in his defense, with the first stating the woman had failed to prove a claim on which relief could be granted.
Another argument states the woman’s complaint does not “satisfy all or some elements of her claim under the Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Victim Protection Act.” His claim was deemed “unconstitutional” because it had “prejudiced” Diddy. The statement reads:
“The Plaintiff’s decision to wait over two decades to file his complaint has prejudiced the Defendant, as he has lost the ability to fully and fairly defend himself in this action. For example, some or all of the evidence that would otherwise be available if the action had been commenced promptly may be unavailable, lost or compromised.”
“Allowing this action to proceed violates the Defendants’ rights under the US Constitution and the New York State Constitution,” the document continued, noting that Diddy was robbed of valuable evidence and witnesses due to the passage of so much time.
Diddy asked for a jury trial to settle the case. His additional requests include dismissal of the complaint with prejudice in all respects, protection of attorney’s fees and other costs, and any relief deemed necessary by the court.
Categories: Trending
Source: thtrangdai.edu.vn/en/
