Christina Hall is determined not to be caught slipping!
The star, who shares son Hudson with ex-husband Ant Anstead, has been accused of using their son’s face on social media to make money, and this has led to a long and drawn-out legal battle between the couple over full custody of the boy. . To avoid any issues that might lead to her right to access her son being revoked, she hides her face from her posts even during holiday celebrations.
Christina Hall Crops Son Hudson’s Face From Thanksgiving Family Portrait
Instagram | Christina Hall
Taking to her Instagram page, she posted a picture of her family standing in a meadow, huddled together with big smiles on their faces. They were dressed mostly in neutrals and matching colors to suit the Autumn mood, with white shirts over blue jeans for the adults and blue shirts for the kids, with Brayden and Hudson wearing matching tops.
She captioned the post, “What better backdrop for a family photo than a beautiful fall field?! This shoot is one of my favorites. I love my family ❤️.” One thing that is very clear, however, is the large emoji she placed over the 3-year-old’s face to cover it up.
Fans will remember that after Anstead accused her of exploiting their son, she decided to stop posting on her page, and this didn’t go unnoticed by followers who commented on the unfairness of it all. One user wrote, “How stupid you can’t show pictures of your son, but he put them on Instagram. Beautiful family,” while another said, “His dad can show his face, but you can’t? Ridiculous ??.”
While some felt she was trying to destroy her name and career while separating her from her baby, the reality TV star seems to have an idea to explain her behavior. The “Brother vs. Brother” judge believes the problem is “Post-Breakup Abuse,” which he reposted from the article.
Instagram | Christina Hall
This diagnosis made by Kaitlyn Jorgensen — who believes in “Creating stronger strategies in response to Intimate Partner Violence” — responds to headlines about the mother of three’s decision to stop posting her son’s face because of his father’s pressure on him.
“Can we make something happen here? This is not an “agreement,” she began, adding, “an agreement is something you enter into voluntarily. However, when your ex-husband sues you, belittles you, or comes for your career, your new marriage, your children, your family , friends, etc., your element of free will is taken from you. It’s like being held hostage.”
Jorgensen notes that mothers who experience “Post-Separation Abuse” are not free to make deals while hoping the press will shed some light on that. He concluded by emphasizing that the star of “Christina on the Coast” and the TV presenter do not have the same position on this issue but he intends to use the power of the Court to punish him for “being outside of him, and for being brave enough to leave him.”
‘Flip or Flop’ Co-Host Responds to Ant Anstead’s Allegations Amid Custody Battle
MEGA
The former couple have been embroiled in a bitter custody battle since April this year when the 43-year-old filed for an emergency order for full custody because she believed he had put their child in a number of dangerous situations for financial gain.
Although her request was denied the same day it was filed, documents reviewed by Insider reveal that the estranged couple already share a 50/50 custody schedule. Anstead declared that giving her full custody was the best way to protect Hudson because she believed he had her footage and was exploiting it for paid advertising without her knowledge or consent.
Hall responded, “I have never exploited our son Hudson. He appears in several of my Instagram ads that each take less than a minute to film. He states that in all the footage he has, he is involved in fun activities for children his age and nothing else.
The TV star later revealed that her father was the one who posted her on social media while “tagging products and businesses” to promote the post organically. He further noted that since April, the toddler has not appeared “on television or on social media,” including his father, until he is old enough to make his own decisions.
In conclusion, he revealed that the “Wheeler Dealers” co-host had no problem with their son being filmed, initially calling his recent stance hypocritical.
Categories: Trending
Source: thtrangdai.edu.vn/en/
