Katy Perry’s legal battle over a $15 million estate with an old man continues with a surprising twist!
The Pop star and her husband, Orlando Bloom, are embroiled in a fiery case against veteran Carl Westcott over the sale of his Montecito home. In their latest court hearing, the drama between the famous couple and the 84-year-old was interrupted by the woman’s stormy entrance.
Woman Pushed Into Courtroom During Katy Perry’s Estate Trial
On Thursday, legal proceedings in a real estate trial were suddenly interrupted when an unknown woman burst into the courtroom like a raging bull. The incident occurred as the neurologist took the stand to answer questions about Westcott’s “cognitive capacity.”
MEGA
Dr. Daniel Franc attended the hearing at the request of Perry and Bloom’s business manager, Bernie Gudvi. The neurologist was called to testify whether the 84-year-old entrepreneur was incapable of reasoning in July 2020, when the couple bought his Montecito Mansion for $15 million.
The medical practitioner gave her diagnosis as the unidentified woman burst into the courtroom, according to PEOPLE. His first attempt to disrupt legal proceedings was met by a court clerk, who begged him to calm down and leave.
The woman’s harassment clearly affected Westcott’s attorney, Andrew Thomas, who immediately asked for deputies to be called into the courtroom. While some may see the lawyer’s fear as an overreaction, it was an appropriate response when the unknown woman walked into the courtroom for the second time.
Fortunately, deputies arrived in time to remove him before things got worse. The woman’s presence clouded the minds of those present, wondering if she had anything to do with the property dispute case.
However, the judge put an end to this speculation by revealing the woman’s beef was with him. According to the legal arbiter, the unidentified woman was unhappy with an unrelated case she was presiding over.
Woman Weighs In on Her Father-in-Law’s Trial Against Katy Perry
Days before the aggrieved woman interrupted Perry’s legal battle against the octogenarian, the veteran’s daughter-in-law, Kameron Westcott, opened up about her family’s case. The “Real Housewives of Dallas” star insisted that Carl never intended to sell his property to the “Roar” hitmaker.
Instagram | Cameron Westcott
In an Instagram Story update, the reality TV personality addressed the real estate dispute trial, which began on September 27. The case revolves around Perry and Bloom’s insistence that the 84-year-old man was in the right mental capacity when he agreed to sell his property. home, while Carl claims otherwise.
“We’re in the second day of the trial, and I just want to make the obvious. The other party is basically saying he was in the right state to sign the document he signed. And again, he’s 84 years old,” Kameron explained in the video. “At that time, he still had Huntington’s disease, dementia, and in that time, you have impulsive behavior.”
The blonde beauty insists that her father-in-law never intended to sell the property but unfortunately he realized it after signing the deal. Kameron claims Carl’s legal battle against Perry and Bloom is to raise awareness about elder protection and prevent future victims.
“We’re just here fighting for justice, and I just hope in the future this doesn’t happen to other parents. Terrible to have to go through this,” lamented the social media influencer.
“We need to protect our parents. We should be a little nicer to our parents, and it may seem like they are in the right frame of mind, but that doesn’t mean they are,” Kameron concluded her post.
Fans Slam Katy Perry As Her Real Estate Case Inspires Senior Citizens Protection Bill
Still, the drama between the “Wide Awake” singer and the octogenarian comes with unexpected blessings for the elderly. In the wake of the outbreak, efforts to pass the Protecting the Elderly Property for Retirement Years Act increased as people became concerned about older generations being kicked out of their homes.
MEGA
The bill, known as the Katy Perry Act, would address “the risk of financial abuse of the elderly, particularly related to the sale and transfer of real estate and real estate” if adopted. For more information on the Act, according to its website, read:
“The Act establishes a 72-hour cooling-off period during which any party to a contract for the transfer of a private residence, where one party is over 75 years of age, may cancel the agreement without penalty.”
Fans reacted positively to the news, with many slamming the “Dark Horse” hitmaker for fighting to buy an unwilling man a home. “Imagine getting an elder abuse bill named after you,” quipped one social media user. Another critic slammed Perry, writing: “Lmaooo they had to do something to stop him.”
Categories: Trending
Source: thtrangdai.edu.vn/en/
